Now Inc. (NYSE: DNOW) hit $11.85 today and I began to build a position. This document contains an independent analysis of the company. Information on my investment philosophy can be found here.

Continue reading “Analysis: NOW Inc. (NYSE: DNOW)”

Skip to content
# Wiser Daily

## Analysis: NOW Inc. (NYSE: DNOW)

## Book Review: Competition Demystified

## Analysis: Q2-2017 Macro Update

## Investment Theory #22: Klarman’s 2000 Letter

## Economics #8: Cost Disease

## Programming #10: AI Sudoku

## Investment Theory #21: Klarman’s 1999 Letter

All we have to do is be better than we were yesterday.

Now Inc. (NYSE: DNOW) hit $11.85 today and I began to build a position. This document contains an independent analysis of the company. Information on my investment philosophy can be found here.

Continue reading “Analysis: NOW Inc. (NYSE: DNOW)”

Advertisements

In Competition Demystified, Bruce Greenwald and Judd Kahn simplify Michael Porter’s five forces framework (threat of new entrants, threat of substitutes, customer bargaining power, supplier bargaining power, industry rivalry) into a single force from which all others derive: barriers to entry. According to the authors, there are three sources of this competitive advantage:

- Supply Advantages: Lower input costs, proprietary technology, complicated processes, etc.
- Demand Advantages: Captive customers, habitual products, high switching costs, high search costs, network effects.
- Economies of Scale: High fixed costs spread across high market share.

Say we throw a ball up in the air and want to predict what will happen next. Newton tells us that transferring kinetic energy to the ball will accelerate it upwards, and the force of gravity will accelerate it downwards. We can confidently say the ball will eventually come back down to earth. Now, try predicting what would happen to the ball if instead, a random survey of the human population decided its movements. If more people felt like the ball should go up it would go up and vice versa.

There is no shortage of forecasters who would take a simplified approach to this problem – just assume the physics bound world and ignore the human element. Eventually, the two should match up. We can think of this as the efficient market camp. Contrast that to the behavioral camp, which focuses primarily on the human element. They note that the fear and greed of a crowd can push the ball to further extremes than the constraints of physics would suggest.

Our goal today is to predict where that economic ball is going. We will borrow from both camps, while not forgetting that this is an exercise in art, not science. We can’t predict where the ball is going nor when it will get there with any certainty, but we can get a decent idea of where the ball is. If the ball is closer to earth, odds are it will begin its journey upward. If the ball is closer to space, odds are it will begin its journey downward. Give or take ten years.

Let’s continue our series on the 1990’s. You may recall that 2000 was the year the bubble popped and Klarman began putting his large cash balances to work.

Klarman is a well-respected value investor who founded the Baupost Group in 1982. Since then he has generated an average annual return of 19%. Klarman’s investing philosophy can be summed up by the title of his book *Margin of Safety: Risk-Averse Value Investing Strategies for the Thoughtful Investor*.

This series of posts will reflect on Klarman’s activity during the period 1995 to 2001. Links to past posts: 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999

Continue reading “Investment Theory #22: Klarman’s 2000 Letter”

In economics, there is a simple idea called the Cobb-Douglas production function that tries to explain the relationship between labor (the total number of person-hours worked), capital (the real value of all machinery, equipment, and buildings), total factor productivity (the ability to produce more output with less input), and the total output of an economy. The idea is that since labor and capital are relatively fixed, economies grow by increasing their productivity, which technology is the main driver of.

Sudoku is one of those NP-Complete problems that brute force solutions have a problem with. Consider a board with a single blank space, we would have to work through 9 possibilities to find the right answer. For two blank spaces, we would work through 9 possibilities for the first space, and then for each of those possibilities, 9 for the second.

This simplifies to a time complexity of O(n^m) where n is the number of possibilities for each square (9 in normal Sudoku) and m is the number of blank spaces. A hard Sudoku problem with 50 blank spaces would take about 5.15 * 10^{47} computations, which would take longer than the age of the universe to solve with a decent computer.

This is where artificial intelligence (AI) comes into play. Think of AI less as a Skynet robot and more as a set of hacks to solve exponential problems like Sudoku. Code for this post can be found here.

Continue reading “Programming #10: AI Sudoku”

I’ve been awol while studying for the CFA. With level 3 hopefully behind me, I’m going to get back into the habit of writing. Let’s jump back into our series on the 1990’s with Seth Klarman’s letters as our guide to the period.

Klarman is a well-respected value investor who founded the Baupost Group in 1982. Since then he has generated an average annual return of 19%. Klarman’s investing philosophy can be summed up by the title of his book *Margin of Safety: Risk-Averse Value Investing Strategies for the Thoughtful Investor*.

This series of posts will reflect on Klarman’s activity during the period 1995 to 2001. Links to past posts: 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998

Continue reading “Investment Theory #21: Klarman’s 1999 Letter”